Neko ([info]nekosmuse) wrote,
@ 2007-09-27 11:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:politicking, politics

My fellow Ontarians
I know I'm not using this journal these days, but I wanted to talk about something important today, because it needs to be passed along. People need to start talking about this, because right now no one knows about it.

I'm talking about the upcoming Ontario Referendum.

Non Ontarians can ignore this.

My fellows Ontarians, however --I urge you to talk about this. Whatever your views or position. No one seems to know what this referendum is about and it is IMPORTANT. It could change the face of Ontario politics.

On October 10th, in addition to casting your vote, you will be asked to vote on a single question. The question is as follows:

Which electoral system should Ontario use to elect members to the provincial legislature?

You will be given 2 options:

Option A: The existing electoral system (First-Past-the-Post)

or

Option B: The alternative electoral system proposed by the Citizens' Assembly (Mixed Member Proportional)

Sadly, few people know about the alternate system proposed. And Elections Ontario is doing relatively little to inform the public about this system. Why? It hurts Ontario's two main political parties (the Conservatives and the Liberals).



Option A: The existing electoral system (First-Past-the-Post)

This is our current system. Now, when you vote in Ontario, you go into a polling station and vote for the person who represents your riding. One ballot. One vote. The person who gets the most votes wins the seat for their party. The party with the most seats forms a government.

This system has its advantages. It allows for regional representation, is fairly simply, and provides a clear path to winning an election. It also allows the public to choose who will represent them, rather than putting this power into the hands of the winning party.

This system also has its disadvantages. It ignores the votes/will of a significant portion of the population. In essence, unless you vote for the winning guy, your vote is useless. Smaller parties (such as the Green Party, and the NDP) are underrepresented in Parliament (compared to percentage of vote) because they cannot earn enough votes to win a riding. In short, it's an extremely unfair system.

Now, let's look at the alternative.

Option B: The alternative electoral system proposed by the Citizens' Assembly (Mixed Member Proportional)

If accepted, future Ontario voters will have 2 votes. You vote first for the person running in your riding. Then, you cast a second ballot for the party of your choosing. At the riding level, the person with the most votes wins (just like Option A). At the Parliament level, seats have been set aside for proportional representation.

This means that a selection of seats are handed out to the parties based on their percentage of vote. NOTE: A party *must* have 3% of the vote to be considered for proportional representation. This means fringe parties are NOT going to win seats. What it does mean is that smaller parties (the Green Party, the NDP) are going to win more/some seats.

This system is very popular in Europe and has numerous advantages, the primary advantage being that you, the voter, actually get to decide which parties are represented in Parliament. It also ensures the diversification of Parliament, meaning that more interests will be represented.

There are, of course, disadvantages. Of the "list members" --ie those that will win seats based on proportional representation-- the public has no say in who is chosen. You vote for a party, not an individual. The mixed system lessens the possible consequences of this (i.e. using a full proportional representation system might result in an 'all boys' club) but for a portion of the seats, this problem still exists. There is also the possibility that the formation of a majority government may be made difficult (although this is not necessarily a bad thing). Years might pass before the Ontario government became efficient at operating in this new system.



As you can see, then, there are good and bad points for both systems. I myself will be voting in favour of a mixed member proportional system. I am tired of this province (and country) being run by the Conservatives/Liberals. I think it's time for some new blood. Some new ideas.

You, of course, can decide for yourself, but please, be informed. Know what they're asking you. Know the consequences of your answer.

Once you are informed, spread the word. Tell your friends. Tell your family. Tell your co-workers. Tell a stranger on the street. Tell everyone you can, because the government's not going to do it, and they're not going to let the media do it. They do not want this change. The people, however, do.

More information can be found here.




(Post a new comment)


[info]sarken
2007-09-27 05:15 pm UTC (link)
I'm not from Ontario, but you know how I love to get my geek on about this stuff.

MMP is the bombdiggity, and I'm jealous that y'all are at least entertaining the thought. The voting for a party rather than an individual bit always bothered me on some level, but I think that's mostly because it's not what I'm used to. When you think about it, voting for an individual actually causes problems -- voters can be dingbats and vote for the personality rather than the policies. The 2004 elections in America were a pretty good example of such stupidity. I will never, ever forget the poll that asked voters if they would rather have a beer with Bush or Kerry. Who cares? It's not going to happen.

I'm sorry. I'm still bitter. ;o)

(Reply to this)


[info]xtrustno1x
2007-09-27 07:03 pm UTC (link)
Obviously not an Ontarian, but I'm always fascinated by how other countries run (and often run better than my own...). Thanks for enlightening me!

(Reply to this)


[info]ci5rod
2007-09-28 12:54 am UTC (link)
Another non-Ontarian, and I'm definitely backing you on this one. I'm not a fan of list systems like MMP because they actually increase the amount of power parties have over their members, which is a Bad Thing. On the other hand, anything makes for a better electoral system than FPTP. At least if you get MMP in there's a chance for moving on to something better in the future (like, say, STV in multi-member constituencies).

Yes, I can talk like this for hours :-)

(Reply to this)


[info]lianneb
2007-10-02 05:12 pm UTC (link)
I'm an Ontarian who *will* be voting for the new system. Unfortunately, the brochure that has been sent out 'explaining' the new system doesn't really do a good job of it. The reason I actually understand it is that I did research online to understand it. I've been explaining it to other people who do not understand the brochure either.

My father's only objection, though, is that it would mean more MPPs, which means more staff, more offices, more... well, more expense, and he objects to that.

(Reply to this)

Neko...
[info]monack
2007-11-02 03:55 am UTC (link)
Can you drop me an e-mail with your current e-mail address?
I don't know what I did with it, and I would love to keep in touch.
Miss you more than I know how to put into words.

Mona

(Reply to this)


[info]twincy
2008-06-04 01:00 pm UTC (link)
I miss you.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…